Note: Single-source report; awaiting corroboration.
A UN independent human rights expert has urged UK political leaders to support the implementation of the Supreme Court ruling that defines legal sex by biological characteristics rather than gender identity, warning that opposing updated equality guidance could weaken protections for women and girls. Reem Alsalem, Special Rapporteur on violence against women and girls appointed by the Human Rights Council, expressed concern over criticism of the Equality and Human Rights Commission's (EHRC) draft Code of Practice, published on 21 May 2026. This code outlines how organizations should apply the ruling in practice, including provisions for single-sex spaces and services based on biological sex.
The Supreme Court's April 2025 decision, consistent with the Equality Act 2010, clarified that the legal definition of "sex" refers to biological sex, affecting areas such as access to changing rooms, hospital wards, and domestic abuse refuges. The decision has sparked debate over the balance between safeguarding women’s rights and transgender inclusivity. Supporters say the ruling provides legal clarity and strengthens protections for women-only spaces, while critics warn it may exclude or discriminate against transgender individuals.
Alsalem emphasized the fragility of protections for women's rights, highlighting how easily rights to safety, privacy, and dignity can be challenged. She stressed that single-sex spaces are essential safeguards for women and girls, especially to protect from male violence, and referenced international human rights law that allows sex-based measures to pursue a legitimate aim and ensure equal enjoyment of rights.
The expert also addressed debates about inquiries into a person’s sex, asserting that sex is an objective and relevant characteristic in many legal and social contexts, including single-sex spaces. She noted that proportionate questions may sometimes be necessary to ensure legal compliance.